CrowdSquare - Invest in real estate online

Independent Review of CityVest: What Investors Should Know Before Committing

CityVest is a real estate investment platform that has positioned itself as a gateway for accredited investors to access institutional-quality real estate funds. By pooling capital, CityVest claims to offer exposure to high-end deals with lower minimums than traditional private equity real estate firms. However, while the platform has drawn attention for its innovative model, investor experiences tell a more complex story.

In this independent review of CityVest, we break down the pros and cons, examine real investor feedback, and evaluate whether it’s a trustworthy platform for your capital.

CityVest operates by creating feeder funds that pool investments from individuals and then direct that capital into larger institutional real estate funds. This model aims to give individual investors access to funds that would typically require multi-million-dollar minimums. Their target returns typically range from 15-20% IRR, and they claim thorough due diligence and oversight of fund sponsors.

Some investors report that they have received dividends on time and were satisfied with the performance of their investments — at least initially. One investor shared:

“I have gotten my dividends at a timely pace and have been ok with the rate of return.”

These comments suggest that CityVest can deliver on its promise — when market conditions are favorable and the sponsor funds perform as expected. For those looking for an entry point into high-quality real estate investing, the platform may offer some level of access.

However, a recurring theme among user reviews is poor communication and operational delays. A primary issue revolves around delayed K-1 forms — vital documents needed for tax reporting. Several investors reported receiving K-1s months after the tax deadline, making personal tax filing a frustrating experience.

One reviewer stated:

“K1s not ready until September. No more dividends given the mortgage environment... Would not invest another penny.”

This delay is more than a minor inconvenience — it reflects a lack of transparency and ineffective back-office management, especially considering that many investors have reached out via email and received no response.

Beyond administrative issues, some investors expressed deeper concerns about CityVest’s financial stability and overall transparency. One individual warned:

“I'm starting to suspect these folks will be the next chapter 11 story... They've damaged the credibility of the CFRE environment.”

Another investor noted that the phone number listed on CityVest’s website was invalid, and multiple attempts to make contact went unanswered. This type of behavior raises serious red flags, especially in an industry where investor trust is paramount.

Across the board, reviews point to non-existent customer service. When questions arise — especially regarding tax documents, dividends, or the health of a fund — investors expect timely, accurate information. Unfortunately, the consensus seems to be that CityVest falls short in this area.

“Communication is sparse and customer service is non-existent... I haven't invested after my initial experience.”

This erosion of investor trust can be difficult to recover from, especially in the real estate crowdfunding space, which is still gaining traction and legitimacy.

While CityVest may offer access to elite real estate investment opportunities, the platform’s lack of communication, delayed tax documentation, and uncertain customer support present real concerns.

In today’s environment — where transparency, accessibility, and service are key to investor confidence — these shortcomings may outweigh the potential benefits. For those considering CityVest, it’s essential to proceed with caution, conduct thorough due diligence, and consider alternative platforms with stronger reputations and investor support.